When astronomers talk about the universe, they mean everything that is accessible to our observations. The universe includes all that we can survey or experiment on, from the moon that orbits our own planet out to the most distant islands of stars in the vastness of space. Since we cannot visit most of the universe, we rely on the information it can send to us. Fortunately, we receive an enormous amount of cosmic information all the time, coded into the waves of light and other forms of energy that come to us from objects at all distances. The main task of astronomy is to decode that information and assemble a coherent picture of the cosmos.
Locally, our planet is one of nine that orbits the pleasantly energetic star we call the Sun. The solar system (Sun's system) also includes dozens of moons and countless pieces of rocky and icy debris left over from when the system formed. Astronomers now have many samples of these other worlds to analyze, including the rocks the astronauts brought back from the Moon, the meteorites (chunks of rock) that fall from space, including a few that were blasted off Mars long ago, and the cosmic dust we can catch high in the atmosphere.
The nature of the universe, its age, its birth and life story, have been deduced through the process of science. This process has many aspects and stages. In the case of astronomy, it usually starts with making careful observations and measurements -- something your students can begin to do through inspection of astronomical images, and observation of the real sky. Together with our knowledge of the laws of physics, developed in laboratories here on Earth, these observations provide the basis for our understanding of the universe. From continuing observations, astronomers develop models and theories to explain how things work in the realms of the planets, stars, and galaxies.
In science, we test our ideas by making further observations and doing experiments. All suggestions (hypotheses) must ultimately be confirmed by testing them against the evidence of the real world. As much as possible, we must leave our prejudices and preferences outside the laboratory or observatory door. When the experiments and observations have spoken, we must accept their results gracefully.
When scientists measured the age of the universe (as we will describe in a moment), they did not hope or wish for it to have a particular age, and try to make their results come out according to those wishes. Instead, they did the best they could to understand nature and then reported what their observations had told them.
The Sun and other stars shine by converting superheated hydrogen in their centers into helium in a process called thermonuclear fusion. Under the intense heat and pressure in a star's core, hydrogen nuclei fuse together and produce helium nuclei - and energy. This is the same process that occurs in the hydrogen bomb on Earth. We can determine how long a star can shine by this process as follows: we know how much energy comes from fusing each atom of hydrogen, the amount of hot hydrogen in the star's core, and how fast the star is using its energy. We can therefore calculate how long it will last before it runs out of fuel. The answer for the Sun is about 10 billion years for its total lifetime. We know from measurements of the age of the solar system - see below - that the Sun is now about 4.5 billion years old. So our star is about halfway through its life.
Other stars may have different lifetimes. Stars smaller (less massive) than the Sun have longer lives because they fuse their hydrogen fuel so much more slowly. Similarly, a sub-compact car may have a smaller gas tank than a large SUV, but it may be able to drive much longer on a full tank of gas, because it uses its fuel much more slowly.
When a star has used up the available hydrogen fuel in its center, it expands and becomes a "red giant". Once we have found such a giant star, we know that it has used up all its hydrogen. If we can estimate its initial mass, and hence its initial power, we can estimate its lifetime, and we therefore know its age. This is equivalent to saying that, if we see a car that has just run out of gas, and if we know its horsepower, fuel efficiency, and fuel capacity, we can figure out how long it had been driving since the last fill-up before it ran out of gas.
In this way, we can measure the ages of certain stars. When we apply this method to the oldest stars we can find, we obtain ages of 10 - 15 billion years.
The galaxies, however, are so distant that their light may take billions of years to reach us. So when we look deeply into space we are looking into the past, across vast gulfs of time. When we study distant galaxies, we find that their stars are still being born from the loose gas from which the galaxies formed. When we study even more distant galaxies, we see them as they were 10 billion or more years ago. In these long-ago galaxies, we find that the stars are just beginning to form.
The "Hubble Deep Field" is a 10-day time exposure made by the Hubble Space Telescope. Almost every object in this image is a distant galaxy, seen as it was in the past - at times up to 10 billion years ago. It is from images such as this that we can unravel the history of the universe and determine its age.
Just after the Big Bang, the universe was made almost entirely of the simplest elements: hydrogen and helium. We have confirmed this by looking at galaxies really far away - and thus long ago. And, indeed, they have greater proportions of hydrogen and helium. The other chemical elements were formed later -- some in nuclear reactions in the cores of stars, others when the most massive stars ended their lives in gargantuan explosions that astronomers call a supernova. (A spectacular supernova was observed in 1987 in a galaxy very close to ours. Astronomers actually observed some of the newly-formed elements emerging in this explosion.)
Some isotopes (forms of the element with different numbers of neutrons in the nucleus) of these elements are radioactive; they change into other isotopes at a rate that can be measured accurately in the laboratory. As time goes on, less and less of the original or "parent" isotope is left and more and more of the product or "daughter" isotope can be found all around it. By comparing the amount of the parent isotope to that of the daughter isotope, astronomers can determine how long it has been since the radioactive parent isotope formed. In this way, astronomers have determined that, although some radioactive isotopes (such as the ones produced by the 1987 supernova) are recently formed, the oldest radioactive isotopes in the universe are 10-20 billion years old.
The same radioactive dating technique allows us to measure the ages of the oldest rocks on Earth, on the Moon, and in meteorites, chunks of rock from space that land on Earth. Such dating experiments have shown that the age of the solar system (the Sun and its planets) is about 4.5 billion years, as we mentioned above. The universe is a lot older than our little neighborhood. More recently, the same technique has even been used to confirm the ages of stars.
The key thing to notice is that all of the independent estimates of the age of the universe are in remarkable agreement - our best estimate being about 14 billion years, give or take a 10 percent measurement uncertainty. That strengthens astronomers' view that the universe, the galaxies, and the stars are truly ancient, and not recent creations. There are other less direct ways of estimating the ages of these objects, and the age of the solar system, and they too are in agreement.
If you and your students take a good look at a world map, you can see that the continents "fit into" one another like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. The coastline of Africa, for instance, neatly fits into that of South America. This is because these continents used to be joined, but have been drifting apart. Far back in the past, the very face of our world was different. Today, scientists can actually measure the rate at which the continents are moving - a few centimeters per year - and estimate how long it has taken them to move apart to their present positions.
Similarly, astronomers (able to glimpse any given star for only a "moment" of its long existence) must examine many stars and hope to find some in each stage of its life. And we have been able to do exactly that - we have found young stars near the "maternity wards" of gas and dust where they are born. We can observe stars like our own Sun, which are in the stable "adult" stage of their lives. (A good number of such sun-like stars nearby are surrounded by one or more planets, just like the Sun is.) We can see red giant stars in "mid-life crisis", bloated by changes deep within. And studying stellar corpses called white dwarfs and neutron stars, we observe the after-effects of stellar death.
The slow processes of stellar life and death can be deduced from groupings of stars called star clusters, groups of stars which are born together and live out their lives as a group. A good example of such a group is the beautiful Pleiades cluster, which can be seen in the fall and winter sky. In such a cluster, different stars go through their lives at different paces, and we can find stars that started together, but are now in very different stages of their lives.
Changes in how stars live their lives can be observed directly in a special class of stars called "pulsating variable stars"; the North Star - Polaris - is one example. This star expands and contracts in rhythmic fashion, every 4 days. But as it slowly swells with age, it becomes larger, and the regular expansion and contraction take measurably longer.
What do we learn from studying the stars in different stages (and by simulating their behavior and physics on high-speed computers)? We find that stars evolve from one form to another - from energetic youngsters, to stable adults, to bloated giants, and on to death and becoming a corpse. We note (because some stars explode) that new generations of stars include some of the materials produced by previous generations and that the number of more complex atoms in the universe is slowly growing. We have good evidence that our Sun (with its planets) was not among the first stars the universe produced, but formed later from materials enriched by the deaths of previous generations.
This is a key idea in astronomy - that the evolution of the stars gradually changes the make-up of the cosmos. The stars are not mere backdrops to our existence on Earth - creatures as complex as we are could not have evolved on Earth without the materials that earlier generations of stars contributed to the cosmic "element-pool." And the Sun itself will not last forever, but will someday die. In the process, it will eventually expand and make life on Earth impossible, quite independent of what we humans do.
Perhaps the most spectacular discovery of all was a faint "hiss" of radio signals coming equally from all directions in the universe. This background hiss has a spectrum (a range of waves) that can only be produced by matter compressed to high density and heated to enormous temperatures. What could have filled the entire universe with such radiation? Our evidence shows that it is the faint remnant of the blazing inferno of the Big Bang, now cooled down by the expansion of the universe. This discovery provides direct evidence that, far back in the past, the universe was ultra-dense and ultra-hot, very different from the cold and much more spread-out universe we see today. Many other lines of evidence also point to a hot beginning for the cosmos.
Today, astronomers are mapping this "background radio radiation" in detail to learn everything we can about how the universe evolved in those early days. Recently these maps have started to reveal the "seeds" of the structure we now see in the universe - denser regions of gas that subsequently gave birth to the great groups of galaxies we observe around us.
Again, it is clear that the universe has changed profoundly since its earliest days.
Dalrymple, G. Brent The Age of the Earth. 1991, Stanford U. Press. A discussion of how we measure the ages of objects in our solar system.
Hartmann, William "Piecing Together Earth's Early History" in Astronomy, June 1989, p. 24.
Wood, John "Forging the Planets" in Sky & Telescope, Jan. 1999, p. 36.
Wood, John "The Origin of the Solar System" in Beatty, J., et al., eds. The New Solar System, 4th ed. 1999, Sky Publishing/Cambridge U. Press.
c. The Age and Evolution of the Universe
Chown, Marcus The Magic Furnace: The Search for the Origin of Atoms. 2001, Free Press/Simon & Schuster. Readable history of the discovery of atomic structure and how stars build up atoms over time.
Davies, Paul "Everyone's Guide to Cosmology" in Sky & Telescope, March 1991, p. 250.
Ferris, Timothy The Whole Shebang. 1997, Simon & Schuster. See especially Chapter 7 on "Cosmic Evolution."
Glanz, James "On Becoming the Material World" in Astronomy, Feb. 1998, p. 44. On how the elements were made in the universe.
Roth, Joshua "Dating the Cosmos: A Progress Report" in Sky & Telescope, Oct. 1997, p. 42.
d. Measuring Cosmic Distances
Eicher, D. "Candles to Light the Night" in Astronomy, Sep. 1994, p. 33. On ways we use cosmic objects that have a standard brightness to measure distances.
Ferguson, Kitty Measuring the Universe: Our Historic Quest to Chart the Horizons of Space and Time.1999, Walker.
Reddy, F. "How Far are the Stars?" in Astronomy, June 1983, p. 6.
2. Responding to Creationist Claims
The literature examining this controversy is enormous; the list below is merely a representative sampling.
Books
Berra, T. Evolution and the Myth of Creationism: A Basic Guide to the Facts in the Evolution Debate. 1990, Stanford U. Press.
Futuyma, D. Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution. 1983, Pantheon. A leading evolutionary biologist explains the case for evolution that the creationists seek to deny.
Godfrey, L., ed. Scientists Confront Creationism. 1982, Norton. A useful collection of articles.
Kitcher, P. Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. 1982, MIT Press. A philosopher takes a critical look at the claims against evolution and illuminates the issues involved.
McGowan, C. In the Beginning: A Scientist Shows Why the Creationists are Wrong. 1984, Prometheus Books. A Canadian zoologist examines and refutes creationist arguments.
National Academy of Science. Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. 1998, National Academy Press. A guide for teachers.
Ruse, M., ed. But Is It Science? 1996, Prometheus. A collection of articles about the creationism/evolution controversy, by scientists, philosophers, etc.
Strahler, A. Science and Earth History: The Evolution / Creation Controversy. 1987, Prometheus Books. A discussion from the geologist's point of view, with lots of information about dating the Earth's rocks.
Tuomey, C. God's Own Scientists: Creationists in a Secular World. 1994, Rutgers U. Press. An anthropologist examines the culture of creationism as if he were looking at far-away tribe.
Wilson, D., ed. Did the Devil Make Darwin Do It? Modern Perspectives on the Creation-Evolution Controversy. 1983, Iowa State U. Press. Interesting collection of essays, by historians, scientists, and educators, laying out the history of the controversy and the perspectives of the sciences.
Gould, Stephen Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. 1999, Library of Contemporary Thought. A well-known scientist and popularizer looks at the relationship between science and religion.
Articles
Abell, G. "The Ages of the Earth and the Universe" in Godfrey, Laurie, ed. Scientists Confront Creationism. 1983, Norton.
Asimov, I. "The Threat of Creationism" in the New York Times Magazine, June 14, 1981, p. 90.
Bobrowsky, M. "Teaching Evolutionary Processes to Skeptical Students" in The Physics Teacher, Dec. 2000, vol. 38, p. 565. Includes an astronomer's responses to creationist arguments.
Dutch, S. "A Critique of Creationist Cosmology" in Journal of Geological Education, 1982, vol. 30, p. 27.
Larson, E. & Witham, L. "Scientists and Religion in America" in Scientific American, Sept. 1999, p. 88. Deals with the range of scientists' religious views, and contains some useful insights on the issue of evolution.
Scott, E. "Antievolution and Creationism in the U.S." Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 1997, vol. 26, p. 263. A leading pro-evolution educator summarizes the issues.
Rusk, J. "Answers to Creationism" in The Planetarian (Journal of the International Planetarium Society), Sep. 1988, vol. 17, No. 3.
Magazines that Follow the Controversy
Reports of the National Center for Science Education, P.O. Box 9477, Berkeley, CA 94709. The center works to oppose the efforts of creationists and to assist educators who want to present the evolutionary perspective.
Skeptical Inquirer Magazine, CSICOP, P.O. Box 703, Amherst, NY 14226. The official magazine of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, the leading skeptical group in the world; it seeks to educate teachers and the public about fantastic claims and how to test them.
A Few Helpful Websites:
National Center for Science Education [www.ncseweb.org] is the key organization working to oppose the efforts of creationists and to assist educators who want to present the evolutionary perspective. The site is full of excellent information and links.
Science and Creationism [bob.nap.edu/html/creationism] is a short booklet from the National Academy of Sciences, with a fine summary of the scientific perspective on evolution.
Talk.Origins Archive [www.talkorigins.org] contains articles, essays, and discussion about all aspects of the creation/evolution controversy.
Questions and Answers about Creationism/Evolution: [www2.uic.edu/~vuletic/cefec.html] A nicely organized summary of creationist arguments and scientific responses.
Voyages through Time [www.seti.org/education/vtt-bg.html] is a curriculum for a one-year high school integrated science course centered on the unifying theme of evolution, being developed by the SETI Institute and others.
A Few Resources on Science and Religion:
The American Scientific Affiliation (http://www.asa3.org) is an organization of professional scientists who are Christians. This group has written a handbook for teachers: "Teaching Science in a Climate of Controversy" (http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources.html), which includes activities for students, and teaching strategies. It emphasizes the remaining open questions in biological and cosmic evolution, as well as the solid evidence for the parts that we do understand.
There is also a web site and email list of professional astronomers who are Christians: http://www.calvin.edu/~dhaarsma/chr-astro.html. Many religions other than Christian, of course, may be represented among your students. The web site www.geocities.com/fourtyres contains a thoughtful article, by science teacher Dr. Douglas Hayhoe, about some possible relationships between science and religion.
* Cosmic Calendar: www.astrosociety.org/education/astro/act2/cosmic.html Students learn to scale the history of the universe since the Big Bang to a one-year calendar, noting where significant events (such as the formation of the Earth or the rise of humans) would fall in that year.
* Toilet Paper Geologic Time Scale: www.nthelp.com/eer/HOAtimetp.html
This activity uses a roll of toilet paper to measure out the 4.6-billion year time span since the Earth formed to scale. Includes a list of major events in biology and geology over that span.
* Exploring Mars: Old, Relatively: cass.jsc.nasa.gov/expmars/activities/oldrel.html
Students examine an image of part of the Mariner Valley complex on Mars with craters and landslides, to see which features formed in what order. (A similar activity using an image with outflow channels and craters is found at: cass.jsc.nasa.gov/expmars/channels.html)
* Hubble Deep Field Academy: amazing-space.stsci.edu/hdf-top-level.html
Students work with real images from the "Hubble Deep Field" - a long exposure view of the most distant galaxies - as they learn about galaxy classification and estimating galaxy distances. (Good use of real data!) Some of the "too-cute" web features may discourage older students, but hard-copy versions are available and can be down-loaded.
* The Expanding Universe: btc.montana.edu/ceres/html/uni1.html
An activity on Hubble's Law, which describes the expansion of the universe. Students measure the separation of dots on an expanding balloon and derive the relationship. Involves learning about cepheid variable stars and cosmic distance measurement.